As many of us are all-too-painfully aware, technology has been a mixed blessing to both business and the law. The ability to generate and store information electronically has allowed us to be more productive, but has increased exponentially the amount and types of documents and data we produce and store.
In turn, this proliferation of ESI has dramatically changed the nature and the cost of litigation, and, in particular, the nature and cost of discovery. In large-scale civil litigation, the lion's share of litigation costs stems from first-level document review: that initial review, usually conducted by junior attorneys or paralegals, to analyze documents for responsiveness, confidentiality, privilege, and to identify and flag key or "hot" documents.
When you're facing millions upon millions of pages of ESI that need first-level document review, do you (1) staff it with lawyers from your firm or from outside counsel, (2) staff it with a mix of lawyers and paralegals from your firm or outside counsel, (3) hire temporary / contract attorneys and/or paralegals to staff the review, or (4) outsource to a U.S. firm specializing in document review? Now, yet another option grows in popularity: "offshoring" or "nearsourcing" your first-level ESI review to lawyers in another country.
Offshoring your document review to another country - like Canada, India, Israel or South Africa - has its benefits, as this article outlines, but it also poses serious risks. Some issues to consider when contemplating offshoring all or part of your first-level review:
- How do the laws of the country to which you are offshoring treat attorney-client privilege, work product privilege, privacy, confidentiality, and ethical issues?
- What are your rights and recourse in the case of data theft or misappropriation?
- Are language issues are surmountable?
- What employee screening and training processes employed by the outside vendor to insure that the most competent, ethical individuals are working on your project?
- What quality control measures does the outside vendor employ to insure that documents are being coded correctly and key documents are not being missed?
- What processes can you put into place to quality control the work from your end?
- What security measures does the outside vendor employ to prevent misappropriation?
- What type of professional liability insurance does the outside vendor retain?
- Can you "audition" the outside vendor first, by quality checking their review of a previously-reviewed set of documents?