"You ain't never had a friend like me." Lyric by Howard Ashman from Disney’s Aladdin,© 1992
Wanna be friends with a judge? Well, he might end up “friending” you on Facebook as part of an in-camera review of your page, if something you post may be relevant to a lawsuit.
Imagine that you are a middle management corporate employee who has finally (urged on by your kids) joined the 21st century and launched a personal Facebook page. And then you friended a bunch of people, including some neighbors, family, and some of your fellow employees and supervisors. Why not? After all, you have a pretty good relationship with them.
Over the next few months, the following occurs:
- You post that your supervisor is an idiot who doesn’t pay any attention to what’s going on in the office. The next day some receivables go missing, and now the boss suspects you. How did he find out? Perhaps you friended him and simply forgot; perhaps you friended another employee who is friends with your boss. Or perhaps you simply forgot to change your privacy settings.
- You are sued by an employee who you friended a while back. Why? You fired him two weeks ago because the employee’s Facebook page showed him skiing on the day he called in sick.
- You posted derogatory comments about your horrible neighbors. A week later someone vandalized their house, and now they are blaming you.
According to an article in the DRI Defense Bar by Michael Goodfried and Martha Dawson, Electronically Stored Information (“ESI”) contained on a party's social networking site can be subject to discovery if it relates to the issues in the litigation. In EEOC v. Simply Storage Mgmt., No. 1:09-cv-1223-WTL-DM, 2010 WL 3446105, at *3, (S.D. Ind. May 11, 2010), the court stated that discovery of social networking sites "requires the application of basic discovery principles in a novel context", and that the challenge is to "define appropriately broad limits . . . on the discoverability of social communications."
Once it’s been determined that the content on the social networking site is subject to discovery, the next element is to determine which particular content is discoverable, based on the court’s consideration of the relevance of the requests within the scope of Rule 26 - or whether the requesting party is on a fishing expedition. “The court may choose to order the user to provide access to their entire profile, or it may order access to a limited portion of the content, such as wall postings available to all of the user's contacts, or messaging with particular individuals. In at least one instance, the court has offered to provide an in camera review by becoming "friends" with the user in order to review the private content for relevancy, before making a decision as to whether the other side could see it. Barnes v. CUS Nashville, No. 3:09-cv-00764, 2010 WL 2265668, at *1 (M.D. Tenn. June 3, 2010).”
Shazzam! Instant friendship with a judge!
So before you post that your assistant is a moron and get sued for defamation, consider whether you really want to friend a judge.
The Social Network…coming soon to an in-camera review in a courtroom near you.