Two e-discovery articles this week highlight a theme to remember: no one escapes document retention and e-discovery obligations.
You think you can't lose. The facts are on your side. The law is on your side. You have a slam-dunk motion for summary judgment. Or three slam-dunk motions. You can coast through until you prevail on the merits, right? WRONG Leonard Deutchman in the Pennsylvania Law Weekly looks at two of the more-famous e-discovery cases from 2008 - Qualcomm, Inc. v. Broadcom Corp. and Keithley v. The Homestore.com, Inc. - both of which demonstrate that even when you prevail on the merits, only a fool disregards her document retention and e-discovery obligations.
In Qualcomm, the appellate court reversed an adverse judgment on the merits in the underlying patent infringement case, but upheld the lower court's findings and rulings as to spoliation and other e-discovery violations, including sanctions imposed on counsel. In Keithley, although the court ruled for the defendants on the merits, it adopted the magistrate judge's sanctions recommendations for spoliation of evidence and late production of discovery. The only bright spot for defendants on the e-discovery front was that the court denied the plaintiffs' motions for adverse inference instructions, solely on the grounds that defendants' victory on the merits mooted that issue.
Even the leader of the free world isn't exempt from document retention and e-discovery obligations. As this Associated Press article on findlaw.com reports, on January 15, Magistrate Judge John Facciola "tore into" the Bush White House, finding that the administration had failed to meet its obligations to preserve ESI, including millions of missing e-mails. And Judge Facciola isn't the only one hitting the White House hard over its document retention obligations; just the day before, U.S. District Judge Henry Kennedy issued an order requiring the White House to search for emails created between March 2003 and October 2005.
Lessons learned? No matter who you are - from the most powerful person in the world to the owner of a small company - and no matter how good your case, you ignore your document preservation and e-discovery obligations at your own peril.